deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×

More from ~T-PEKC


×

3,731

216 87 0
  • Art Print
  • Canvas
  • Photo
Reconstruction of Prenocephale prenes, showing different types of speculative behavior and hypothetic presence of filamentous integumentary structures in pachycephalosaurs. This is my first entry for “All Your Yesterdays” contest - [link].

Prenocephale prenes is pachycephalosaurid ornithischian from the Nemegt formation (Mongolia). It was about 2.4 meters long and lived during the late Campanian, or early Maastricthian times (~ 72 million years ago). It was herbivorous animal. Here, it’s shown hiding from big predator, the theropod Alioramus remotus.

The filamentous integumentary structures depicted here are speculative, but similar integumentary structures, made of beta-keratin and located mostly in the dorsal part of the torso, are found in the ceratopsian Psittacosaurus (Ceratosauria is a sister clade of Pachycephalosauria), and in the heterodontosaur Tianyulong. Both of them being ornithischian dinosaurs (former being more derived, and the latter more basal ornithischian), leave open the possibility that such structures could have been more distributed among the members of the group, and even homologous to the feathers in theropods. Reconstructing Prenocephale with filaments is my way to support the idea (it’s only idea for now given the fossil material at hand and the lack of studies testing this hypothesis) that the presence of filamentous integumentary structures is a basal trait for Dinosauria.

Here, the filaments are located in between the scales, as similar arrangement of feathers and scales is known in some modern birds. This can be explained by Prum’s model for feathers evolution, in which feathers (or protofeather filaments) are homologous in the embryonic stage of animal’s development, and later form different types of integument, which sometimes can coexist.

The majority of the body is covered with scales, following the model seen in Triceratops – subrectangular scales on the ventral side of the body, and finer scales above them. Some of the scales are bigger, with oval form, and are circled by smaller scales, forming rosette-like pattern.

It’s known that at least some dinosaurs (Oryctodromeus and possibly its closest relatives) had an adaptations of digging and were able to live in dens. Similar adaptations are not known for pachycephalosaurids (as far as my knowledge goes), but many digging/denning animals have no obvious adaptations for such behavior/life style. Here, Prenocephale is using a den to hide from a predator. I won’t go as far as stating the burrow was made by the dinosaur, it may just use already existing one.

But denning is not its only protection. If some pachycephalosaurs really were able hide underground from time to time, then they could have gone even further by using mimicry. Because of the specific shape of their head - the dome structure, some of them could have used it to mimic the rocks around, thus increasing their chance to not be noticed by the predator.

References:

Mayr, G., D. S. Peters, G. Plodowski, O. Vogel. 2002. Bristle-like integumentary structures at the tail of the horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus.- Naturwissenschaften, 89, 361-365.

Paul, G. S. 2010. The Princeton field guide to dinosaurs.- Princeton University Press (for Prenocephale skeletal drawing; as obviously seen, neither his style, nor the pose of his skeletal drawing were used in any form in my artwork).

Prum, R. O. 2003. Are current critics of the theropod origin of birds science? Rebuttal to Feduccia (2002).- The Auk, 120, 2, 550-561.

Varricchio, D. J., A. J. Martin, Y. Katsura. 2007. First trace and body fossil evidence of a burrowing, denning dinosaur.- Proceedings of Royal Society Biological Sciences, 274, 1361-1368.

Xu, X., X. Zheng, H. You. 2009. A new feather type in a nonavian theropod and the early evolution of feathers.- Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 3, 832-834.

Details

Stats

Submitted on
January 12
Image Size
40.0 MB
Resolution
7853×6902
Views
3,731 (15 today)
Favourites
216 (who?)
Comments
87
URL
Thumb
Embed
Only verified accounts can report policy violations. Please check your email and click on the verification link.
* Required field
Add a Comment:
 
love 2 2 joy 2 2 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconalgoroth:
Mood: Joy ~Algoroth Feb 14, 2013  Professional General Artist
Nice drawing and a very daring concept. Whether or not you are correct is not as important as trying new concepts.

Be careful though, of thinking something has to be true because of scientific consensus.

Keep up the good work!
Reply
:icont-pekc:
Thank you for the kind words!

Whether or not you are correct is not as important as trying new concepts. ... Be careful though, of thinking something has to be true because of scientific consensus.

Generally what you said is true and I agree with you, but when these new concepts are being applied to any scientific illustration I think they should be as correct as possible, given the facts (or what's known) at hand. Otherwise it wouldn't be scientific illustration but simply a fantasy art. Thus, when making paleoart, I think it's absolutely necessarily to stick to the scientific consensus, and thinking about it as "truth", or atleast as the current version of it. To me, edicated guesses and speculations should not contradict fossil evidence and our momentary understanding of it, but carefully expand it until new data allow scientists falsify these speculations.
Reply
:iconalgoroth:
~Algoroth Feb 15, 2013  Professional General Artist
In many ways, you are correct and you, of course, should continue to work in whatever way you are comfortable. But paleoart is, almost by definition, a form of fantasy art. I agree, drawing a fire-breathing T-rex goes beyond the bounds of current knowledge, into the fantastic/fictional, but drawing only the known is doing yourself and your art and science itself a disservice, IMO.

A burrowing dinosaur is a fascinating idea, but how did this species dig a burrow? Here's where being conservative does not help. Did the Prenocephale appropriate another animal's burrow? You suggest this, and that is as it should be. The integument is fine to my eyes, but there is one problem and it is a major one.

While I can imagine a Prenocephale might have been able to burrow ( I have a hard time imagining it...long legs, very short arms!), this poor beasty cannot move-it's trapped, judging by the way it's drawn. A den under a rock or log might be better.

There are insects that use their heads in the way you describe and the idea sounds good. I wonder...might the large clawed predators have used those claws to dig out burrowing prey? If so, they might have used their senses to sound out their prey. Cool idea for a picture...

Keep up the good work!
Reply
:icondobermunk:
~dobermunk Feb 5, 2013  Professional Filmographer
Absolutely, absolutely grand.
Reply
:icont-pekc:
Thank you!
Reply
:icont-pekc:
Thank you!
Reply
:icondinodanthetrainman:
your very welcome
Reply
:iconladyzind:
This is such a cool idea.
Reply
:icont-pekc:
Thank you!
Reply
Add a Comment: